/Cinny 
Posts
21886Following
434Followers
823lotte adds rac- to words a lot but it doesn’t alter meaning
NSFW posts are not for minors (they will be blocked on sight).
Opinions expressed in this profile are representative of those of your employer.
“u are my favorite therianizing biohazard” — @sodiboo@gaysex.cloud
“you know, maybe i will finally learn to read the content warning before clicking 'view' [—] thanks for this lesson @charlotte” — @ariadne@social.treehouse.systems
pfp by @stickerraccoon.bsky.social
Charlotte /Cinny
charlotte
Show content
@rkniner i am pretty sure at least that is what is going on because the probes on their status page are all just the PDSes. and gifs.bsky.app and video.bsky.app which i presume is where videos are stored
1
0
1
/Cinny
repeated
Ibly 🏳️⚧️ 
Charlotte /Cinny
charlotte
(this is not an invitation for replybros to tell me that Acktchually this other random piece of atproto software doesn’t have this problem. i know and i do not care)
2
1
2
Charlotte /Cinny
charlotte
this also means that intermittently bluesky will just Delete the posts i see out of existence because it decides that my PDS no longer exists. even if they are just random other posts. outstanding
2
0
3
Charlotte /Cinny
charlotte
the other thing i love about bluesky is that currently my PDS (which is Essentially the database for your user account) is in a crash loop because of ????
1
0
4
Charlotte /Cinny
charlotte
@EeveeEuphoria “decentralization? At this time of year! At this time of day! In this part of the country! Localized entirely within your app view?”
“yes”
“may i see it?”
“no”
0
2
3
Charlotte /Cinny
charlotte
i sure love how bluesky is “decentralized” and i “host a node” yet i can’t see jack shit with the central appview being down
6
1
12
/Cinny
repeated
Whitepaws &?🏳️🌈🇳🇱
ruawhitepaw@chitter.xyzGnome: The user interface should be simple and straightforward, without features that few people are going to use.
KDE:
12
16
2
Charlotte /Cinny
charlotte
@5225225 i guess it’s a difference between “typical average user” and “privacy nerd”
i think it could be feasible to have both. imagine if the identity provider is a single document which contains a sticky “don’t allow any rerolled keys” that is then published on relay/server transparency logs for example
1
0
0
@ben the EU did think of that
the watermark ought to be interoperable between vendors as far as is feasible, this will become a requirement next year
there is also an associated code of practice that would be contractually binding to AI companies. openai, anthropic, google, microsoft, meta, and mistral have signed it, along with over 150 other companies. one stipulation is that the detection needs to be
- always free for specific groups (including researchers, fact checkers, journalists, law enforcement)
- free if the company has >1mil MAU
- free if it’s not bulk use
- and the fee needs to be proportional to the operational cost and be significant for the company
0
0
1
Charlotte /Cinny
charlotte
@5225225 eh i think having user-selectable usernames that then map to a cryptographic identity is the way to go for identity
i think for like larger chats (or ones that are like tied to a specific project or sth) should be stuck on a server with some replicas, dms and small group chats should be p2p
1
0
0