Conversation
it's really funny how people raise outrage over things that don't affect them
don't get me wrong, I'm always happy to see more projects move away from github or at least consider it, but I still have to ask who the fuck
- isn't a business customer
- self-hosts an actions runner but not their own forge
- uses it with a private repository
- needs more than 33h of monthly CI
3
1
1

@novenary honestly i just think it’s extremely weird to charge for compute time that you literally did not provide

1
0
1
@novenary probably the bar, before we switched to codeberg
1
0
0
@novenary and likely a lot of other non-profits and associations too
1
0
0
@sijmen I would say those are a special case of "business customer" tbh and they should either get special accommodation or own more of their infra
0
0
1

@novenary not affected but it’s honestly absolutely just rentseeking behavior. i can understand them charging for actions storage, but not the privilege of running open source apps on my own hardware. the goal of this is just rent-seeking

2
0
1
@halva I don't disagree and it's not cheap at all (0.002$/minute works out to 86.4$ in 30 days if you're running it 24/7, likely stacks if you're running parallel jobs)
but also again it's under such weirdly specific conditions that it's unclear to me who this actually affects and whether they should be using github at all
if the repository is private, github's network effect isn't even in the picture and you can just run your own forgejo instead, especially if you already have the infra to self-host actions runners
0
0
0
@charlotte not really trying to defend gh here, rather just puzzled why you'd use a self-hosted runner with a hosted private repo instead of running your own forge
1
0
0
Edited 7 months ago

@novenary @charlotte

might be something related to “they are gona try milk me later better run away”

1
0
1

@novenary all you need is a system that can run docker. doesn’t need any change to network settings, domains, certs, ssh, what have you. can run behind a trillion layers of nat. only needs to run while code needs to build too

1
0
2
@gabboman @charlotte in that case imo actions were a trap right from the start, at least in my case it has made me start several new projects on github and stalled my migration to codeberg because it's really hard to say no to free shit
I gotta check how cb has been catching up
0
0
0
@charlotte eh I guess that's fair, at least for hobby stuff
0
0
0