Posts
10873Following
416Followers
657PFP by @zombineko@furaffinity.net
Opinions expressed in this profile are representative of those of your employer.
Furry Code
FPR4a A C->+ D>++ H+++ M- P++>++++ R- T+++ W- Z- !S RLCT a cl+++ d e+>++ f++++ h- iwf+++ j p-->- !s
Charlotte 🦝
charlotte
Show content
oh yeah in a few years i have to pay money for not having children can we please get rid of natalism yet
1
0
0
Charlotte 🦝
charlotte
charlotte3's Reise mit Träwelling
https://traewelling.de/status/4025223
> 91,1km von Halle(Saale)Hbf nach Magdeburg Hbf in RE 30.
1
0
1
Charlotte 🦝
charlotte
I’m in S 5X towards Halle(Saale)Hbf! #NowTräwelling
https://traewelling.de/status/4024882
1
0
0
repeated
Show content
but even this analysis fails to account for non-binary people (which I'm one of), so it has to be made perfectly clear:
You can be a perpetrator of sexual violence regardless of sex and gender.
You can be a victim of sexual violence regardless of sex and gender.
Yes, the statistics say the vast majority of perpetrators are men, and the vast majority of victims are women, but in spite of that:
sexual violence can go in all directions in individual cases.
1
4
1
repeated
bundesschrat
schratze@todon.nlShow content
I am once again calling for people to stop spreading the narrative that perpetrators of sexualized violence are always male, and their victims are always female
1. there are genders other than male and female
2. it reeks of gender essentialism (possibly even biological essentialism)
3. it makes it harder for non-female victims of sexualized violence to even realize they have been victims of sexualized violence and get help/justice
4. it makes it harder for victims of offenders who aren't male to realize what happened and get help/justice
2
7
1
Charlotte 🦝
charlotte
charlotte3's Reise mit Träwelling
https://traewelling.de/status/4024179
> 66,4km von Döbeln Hbf nach Leipzig Hbf in RB 110.
0
0
1
Charlotte 🦝
charlotte
proposing an alternative to the bechdel test where you would genderbend every named character and see if people complain about the lack of meaningful male characters
1
0
3
Charlotte 🦝
charlotte
Show content
da vinki resolve
0
3
10
Charlotte 🦝
charlotte
the spec you linked introduces even more ambiguity:
A number is very much like a C or Java number, except that the octal and hexadecimal formats are not used.
a c number can be in binary format (since c23), which doesn’t match the textual, graphical, or bnf-like descriptions of the type in any of the 3 specs
also neither make an attempt at setting ranges or precision for the type, so parsing every number as 0 is perfectly legal.
at least it doesn’t do the ecma404 mistake of having a textual description of numbers that contradicts itself (you can have all of the c-like floating point literal characters in there except that all numbers have to be representable using a sequence of digits (which +, -, ., and e definitely are not)
0
0
0