Feeling vindicated in my resistance to using the demonym Americans for people from the US by Greg Grandin's America, América.
Turns out even the Anglos were on board with America (singular) referring to the whole landmass of South and North America and the demonym American referring to its inhabitants as a whole at one point. And the Latin American countries resisted the US co-opting "America" and "American" for quite some time and avoided referring to them as the United States of America.
They would instead call them the United States of the North or the United States of North America when just United States wasn't enough. Which was quite often in those days, as there were also the United States of Mexico, the United States of Colombia, the United States of Venezuela and the United States of Brazil.
An ambassador from the US of the North actually got really mad at Mexico for not only refusing to call the US their preferred full name, but also "stealing" the United States part from them and using it in their own United States of Mexico.
@schratze At the same time, there are only like seven places Euros will know and accept without further questioning within those so-called united states. My wife has learned to just answer Las Vegas when she doesn't want it to be a whole conversation, because that's one of the seven places and her last US address (ish). @owl
@schratze California seems to work as a whole, like Texas. Chicago and Las Vegas works (though a certain segment of men will give a dame an unpleasant lecherous grin and perhaps some "humorous" comment go go with it for Vegas). Minnesota works quite well in Norway for historical reasons. And I think Hawaii works. @owl
@charlotte @eivind @owl no that's true. There are a lot of places that the US has no right to occupy.
@charlotte @eivind @owl @schratze Nueva España
@charlotte @eivind @owl @schratze and Virginia Mary?
/Cinny
@IngaLovinde @eivind @owl @schratze idk who virginia mary is; possum is more important