Conversation

fuck offfffffffff

3
0
0

audacious will *never* integrate bullshit like this, as long as i have *anything* to say about it

1
0
0

audacious has persisted for 21 years (holy fuck i feel old) because of the love of music, not the love of monetization

2
0
0

@dysfun most likely not!

0
0
0

@ariadne "real users" which they probably don't have.

Bandwidth sharing sound like a residential proxy?

1
0
0

@gbraad audacious has plenty of real users

1
0
0

@ariadne I am not doubting that, but it is weird they use that in their email as a means to grab you attention. The "users" they have aren't even aware of it. Is this legal in the US?

1
0
0

@gbraad sadly, yes, it is legal to include the botnet SDK.

unfortunately i have morals and i will uninstall any project leader that would ever make such a move

0
0
0
@ariadne I didn't know you worked on Audacious. thank you. listening to my shitty CD rips on a music player with an old WinAmp skins is one of the things that still makes me happy
1
0
0
@ariadne btw it would be really cool if someone shared the artifacts for this "bandwidth sharing SDK" 👉👈
1
0
0

@jakob maybe i will respond asking about other windows apps which use this SDK

0
0
0

@ariadne I am very happy about your stance and fully agree. Yet I am surprised, that it should be "opt-in". Wonder if that's their marketing for you, or for real…

1
0
0

@TheConstructor i do not see how it can be legal if it is not opt-in to join the botnet

0
0
0

@ariadne thank you btw, it’s the one music player i keep coming back to

0
0
0