ACAB
the pattern that i notice in so many centrist/liberal parties both abroad and at home is that whenever conservatives or fascists do a terrible thing they don't always challenge the act itself and what it really represents but moreso the fact that it lacks decorum and legal membrane. i legit saw ppl say the problem they have with ICE is not that immigrants are scooped and deported at all but that they are scooped "without due process"
ACAB
and like...i mean they hate ICE so that's a step up but...uhhhhh?
republicans are like "we are kidnapping children in unmarked vans and tearing apart families bc they're foreigners" and dems are like "mark the vans!!!" and "train the kidnappers so they can kidnap more nicely!" or something
ACAB
like yeah sure due process is nice and all and might reduce the amount of people who get snatched away just because some racist าะพัะฐาะฑะฐั decided so
but there's something really unsettling about how a terrible, inhumane thing suddenly becomes normal and civilized when you wrap it in papers
ACAB
i also think because of this tendency to hold decorum and law before ethics that dems are really just handing over reins of power to unbridled fascists who don't care about neither
@mynameistillian yes. mark the vans. don't question why we're rounding people up to throw them in camps, we marked the vans, problem solved!
/Cinny
@mynameistillian itโs an appeal to legalism because they fail to realize that the law itself is harmful too, not just the people enforcing it
ACAB
omg as soon as i typed this i got news that dem leadership is like "why are you saying abolish ice, we need to reform the ice" ๐ญ BRUH
"why are you saying abolish the slave patrols, we need to reform the slave patrols"
"why are you saying abolish the gestapo, we need to reform the gestapo"
do those people fckn hear themselves
@mynameistillian if you wanted to reform ice you had 4 goddamn years