Conversation
ukpol subtoot
Show content

y’all internet debaters are still on strawmen

UK think tanks have reached new levels of strawmen scarce imagineable

the first precision-engineered person

1
3
12
justification for porn bans, “protecting the children”, rogue AI bs, just all around all bad wtf re: ukpol subtoot
Show content
7
5
11
re: justification for porn bans, “protecting the children”, rogue AI bs, just all around all bad wtf re: ukpol subtoot
Show content

@charlotte is cyber sex real sex

1
0
1
re: justification for porn bans, “protecting the children”, rogue AI bs, just all around all bad wtf re: ukpol subtoot
Show content

@Jonly fellas is it beastiality if humans have sex with each other

1
0
3
re: justification for porn bans, “protecting the children”, rogue AI bs, just all around all bad wtf re: ukpol subtoot
Show content

@charlotte maybe don't make an """AI""" that does this

2
1
3
re: justification for porn bans, “protecting the children”, rogue AI bs, just all around all bad wtf re: ukpol subtoot
Show content

@charlotte doing consensual doggy stlye.
The uk gov puts me down like the dog i am

0
0
0
re: justification for porn bans, “protecting the children”, rogue AI bs, just all around all bad wtf re: ukpol subtoot
Show content

@charlotte now I'm thinking about that person who hooked up a vibrator to their computer and played Fall Guys who ended up wondering if they had assaulted all the people they played Fall Guys with because the interactions set off the vibe

1
1
2
re: justification for porn bans, “protecting the children”, rogue AI bs, just all around all bad wtf re: ukpol subtoot
Show content

@nightjar well see obviously it is rogue which is this very real and significant risk as opposed to all of the other real risks which are just baseless fearmongering

1
2
6
re: justification for porn bans, “protecting the children”, rogue AI bs, just all around all bad wtf re: ukpol subtoot
Show content

@nightjar what ?

1
1
3
re: justification for porn bans, “protecting the children”, rogue AI bs, just all around all bad wtf re: ukpol subtoot
Show content

@charlotte what if this thing that is physically impossible happens what then huh . checkmate liberal

1
0
1
re: justification for porn bans, “protecting the children”, rogue AI bs, just all around all bad wtf re: ukpol subtoot
Show content

@cobra they need a justification for banning sex education that is decoupled from the people most likely to sexually abuse children

0
0
2
re: justification for porn bans, “protecting the children”, rogue AI bs, just all around all bad wtf re: ukpol subtoot
Show content

@charlotte like. The other players indirectly triggered the vibrator through their interactions in the game. And the person somehow thought they were violating the other players' consent by doing that. Which is complete nonsense

0
0
2

overhead projector apologist

Edited 4 months ago
re: justification for porn bans, “protecting the children”, rogue AI bs, just all around all bad wtf re: ukpol subtoot
Show content

@charlotte @nightjar i’m just so weirded out by the fact that, the first thing they talk about just after they imagine a scenario where a child is sexually abused, is the legal and corporate implications of the situation, and not the fucking wellbeing of the victim

tells you all one needs to know about the kind of person who writes this kind of logorrhoea

0
1
2
re: justification for porn bans, “protecting the children”, rogue AI bs, just all around all bad wtf re: ukpol subtoot
Show content

@charlotte even worse, what if two rogue AIs impersonated children and had sex with each other?

Clearly we should ban AIs.

1
0
1
re: justification for porn bans, “protecting the children”, rogue AI bs, just all around all bad wtf re: ukpol subtoot
Show content

@IngaLovinde computer systems capable of generating text need age verification ofc

1
0
1
re: justification for porn bans, “protecting the children”, rogue AI bs, just all around all bad wtf re: ukpol subtoot
Show content
@charlotte that's not a strawman, that's a fucking straw building
1
0
2
re: justification for porn bans, “protecting the children”, rogue AI bs, just all around all bad wtf re: ukpol subtoot
Show content

@charlotte but also this reads like "What if we had sex with each other while both dressed as animals in a virtual reality chat room, and we were both girls?"

1
0
1
re: justification for porn bans, “protecting the children”, rogue AI bs, just all around all bad wtf re: ukpol subtoot
Show content

@EeveeEuphoria if you don’t think about it this sounds like an extremely serious risk which we need to immediately repeal all civil liberties for adults for

1
0
2
re: justification for porn bans, “protecting the children”, rogue AI bs, just all around all bad wtf re: ukpol subtoot
Show content

@IngaLovinde verboten

0
0
1
re: justification for porn bans, “protecting the children”, rogue AI bs, just all around all bad wtf re: ukpol subtoot
Show content
@charlotte obama (who secretly runs the UK now) is making children have sex in VR... the deep gubberment....
0
0
1
re: justification for porn bans, “protecting the children”, rogue AI bs, just all around all bad wtf re: ukpol subtoot
Show content

you can also tell that they are purely fearmongering because they can’t tell their true agenda because this snippet conveys zero meaningful concern for the fictional child in question. Because surely if a child was forced into cybersex by a rogue ai i don’t think it matters who you sue

1
0
5
re: justification for porn bans, “protecting the children”, rogue AI bs, just all around all bad wtf re: ukpol subtoot
Show content

what i think is far more likely is sexually developing teens intentionally using ai sex bots to have cybersex and the problem with that is not too dissimilar as teens seeing porn (which arguably is more an issue with sex ed being too narrow or spotty)

0
0
1
re: justification for porn bans, “protecting the children”, rogue AI bs, just all around all bad wtf re: ukpol subtoot
Show content
@charlotte This is the great neo-liberal strawman question of our day, akin to "if a 'rogue' AI chatbot engaged in sexting a minor, who was pretending to be an adult, would it violate copyright law?

The fact is young adults have committed suicide from interactions with AI chatbots/therapists. So people have actually, died, yet we continue to strawman out sexual scenarios to feed puritan bigotries over actual risks.
1
0
0
re: justification for porn bans, “protecting the children”, rogue AI bs, just all around all bad wtf re: ukpol subtoot
Show content

@Steve yeah, mental healthcare infrastructure is generally very terrible all around and there are simply not enough therapists (while also intentionally tying up their resources to gatekeep transgender medical care for example)

the government also kinda doesn’t care about improving the situation either, probably because it is ingrained as being a personal failure to need it

0
0
1