Conversation

neopossum_floof Ibly 🏳️‍⚧️ therian

why in the flying fuck does bluesky have an option to make it so your post is only visible to people logged in

and why in the flying fuck do people willingly use it????

it makes no fucking sense at all, especially when people often use this shit on posts that are trying to spread awareness about something. yeah you fucking dipshit, add the thing that stops people from looking at your post if you’re not on bluesky! that’ll help spread awareness!

inb4 if it’s bluesky trying to be vague and say “you need to sign in so we can verify you’re an adult”, that’s even fucking worse, why do people trust bluesky to not be twitter 2.0 if that’s the case

3
1
0
Missing media descriptions
Show content
to be clear, *this* is what i'm talking about
0
0
0

@EeveeEuphoria i personally have it enabled but my excuse is that i don't actually post that much; not much reason to when i greatly prefer fedi

(also to clarify it's an account-wide setting, not per-post. though it would be nice if you could disable it per-post)

1
0
0
@Erika it being an account-wide setting is even dumber imho, especially when again, people make posts that are supposed to be like "hey everyone pay attention to this", it's like "oh but except you losers who don't have bluesky, fuck you"
0
0
0

@EeveeEuphoria i have seen someone urge artists turn that one to “prevent ai scraping” which sounds like a plan except that ai scrapers can just trivially bypass it and sharing artwork with credit now becomes more difficult than reuploading it without

1
0
1
@charlotte there exists ways to extract images from bluesky without users needing to login anyways, all it does is stop people who can't be fucked with that to look at the posts .-.
1
0
0

@EeveeEuphoria yeah like, the post just is public, but the official bluesky web ui just blocks it client side

it gives users the illusion of privacy which is worse than just not having this option exist at all

0
0
1