Conversation

carbon capture and storage? yeah that’s called plants. where do you think they get all their structural carbon

4
1
0

@chjara it’s actually quite funny because carbon recapture plants are just mechanical plants, but they don’t generate oxygen iirc?

1
0
1

@chjara One of the largest CCS plants in the world, I believe in Iceland, operates full-tilt year round, daily.

It sucks up enough carbon to offset about a few hours’ worth of emissions.

Per day? Per week? Per month?

Per year.

1
1
0

@charlotte don’t they just like store the CO2 directly and like bottle it
to be fair it is pretty energy intensive to break up CO2, there’s a reason it’s the end of so many reactions. maybe they could use solar energy to do it šŸ˜‡

1
0
1
@chjara @charlotte let's cover the ocean with GMO algae that depletes oxygen and kills fish šŸ‘Œ
0
0
0

@chjara as an industry it's a stupid pipedream to hope we can magically find a way to make decarbonization profitable

instead of just refactoring the whole machine to remove all the damn excess waste, they try and hack it so that the thing somehow fixes its own problem. it's working backwards in such a ridiculous way

1
0
0

@chjara that said a lot of these startups do use algae and stuff to capture carbon, since obviously lol

0
0
1

@chjara a carbon storage facility - point at dead plants underground.

1
0
0

@chjara rename oil and gas extraction to ā€œreverse carbon storageā€

0
0
1

@yassie_j @chjara is it actually a net capture or only viable if you run off free unlimited geothermal electricity?

1
0
0

@rune @yassie_j i mean you can get free unlimited electricity pretty much anywhere on earth anyway ā˜€ļø

1
0
0

@chjara @yassie_j true, but solar will add more external costs they have to account for. Iceland has an absurd amount of geothermal that has neglible emissions connected to their setup and operations making it easier to get a positive result however small.

0
0
1