Posts
228
Following
293
Followers
97
27-year-old red fox pretending to be computer engineer. Semi-luddite. Bad photos, random thoughts and lots of reposts.

pfp by StargazingShep on FA
repeated

aetios 🔜 39C3đŸ”»

installing an OS is so second nature to us linux nerds that it's easy to forget that the average person only knows how to partition a drive
3
4
1
repeated
repeated

Crosspost from twitter, source

0
7
2
repeated

🐭on their way to find the BIG cheese!!! art fight attack for vivie (vadapega) 💜

0
2
2
repeated
fuckign fAST jif; Missing media descriptions
Show content
0
2
1
local stores are selling AI-powered lemonade now i guess...
Bottle of lemonade with an imag

0
0
0
repeated

possum shark (comms open)

Art Fight revenge at JamBottle

0
1
1
repeated
Edited 7 months ago

Proof-of-work challenges have become the current hotness for defeating AI scrapers. I think it’s great we have these and that they’re getting deployed to great effect. But I’ve also seen a lot of people claim the “AI scrapers” problem is now solved and I’m sorry to tell you this but no it’s not.

The reason it’s solved right now is because most of these scrapers don’t execute JavaScript. But with enough people deploying PoW proxies, the economics around that change enough to make it worthwhile for AI companies to do so. AI companies have more money than you. Yes it’ll cost them, but that cost is worth it to them because otherwise they don’t have a business.

(Also Anubis and other solutions default to only triggering if the User-Agent header contains Mozilla so guess what! It’ll soon need to be enabled regardless of the value of that header because it’s trivial to circumvent. Then the cost goes up for the operator too as more and more users get affected.)

The JS needed for the PoW stuff isn’t complicated. A small JS interpreter can handle that. What mostly remains is then the cost of the hash. Right now most things use SHA256, for which we have CPU extensions and AVX instructions to speed this up. Constantly increasing the PoW rounds doesn’t solve this. Eventually the experience degrades too much for real users, whereas servers literally don’t care. Nobody is sitting there waiting for the output to be rendered. All they want is to get the content to train on.

PoW proxies are a stopgap, and a very useful one. But a stopgap nonetheless. We’re buying ourselves time. But we’re going to need more than this. Including legislation that outlaws some of this shit entirely.

AI is a technology, but the root of the problem we’re facing is a societal and political one. We cannot ignore those aspects and exclude them from a solution.

0
4
1
repeated

Happy horse on Mars day!

1
9
3
repeated

I'm riding through Windows XP on my way home, anyone want anything? 🚄

0
2
1
jÀrgmine kord saadame eurovisiooni kermo murelit
0
0
1
repeated

MOVED TO @halva@mk.absturztau.be

0
1
1
repeated

mastodon plushie VS small tungsten cube

11
30
6
repeated

@neil

I misread that as "NNTP server" and thought, that's news to me


0
2
1
repeated

And finished! It was a fun quick stitch and it absolutely looks better than 6 colours plus black would suggest.

Backstitching is my favourite part.

1
9
4
repeated

Internet search in


1990: ask people you know for their FTP server address

1995: scroll through twenty pages of Altavista results

2000: ten blue links

2010: ten blue links below ten ads

2020: one useful link to Wikipedia below the fold, all ads above

2024: AI summary followed by ads followed by a Wikipedia link

2025: AI summary followed by AI summaries of ads followed by a Wikipedia link behind an AI summary

2026: ask people you know for their archive torrent address

0
4
2
repeated
repeated

Reasons why you should date a fox: thread đŸ§”

1
3
1
Show older