Conversation

@chjara > lack of CAS
Yet it still runs on HPPA 02lurk

And yes even the earliest x86s support (unconditional) XCHG so emulating CAS is possible (albeit not lockfree)

0
0
1
@chjara it'll be a good time to be an ewaste processor with an ebay store and a sideline in Linux evangelism
0
1
0

@chjara Although try and actually run a recent Linux/*BSD on a 486 and you will quickly wish you hadn't. They're about three orders of magnitude slower than current machines, and while stuff will usually run, it implicitly assumes a machine with a bit more grunt and is quite a bit slower than (an earlier version of) the same software in a distribution from the 1990s or 2000s.

0
0
1

@chjara see on the one hand yeah it sucks on the other, in a system where all binaries are precompiled, surely this helps performance no?

0
0
1

@chjara oh yeah the “official” requirements are braindead but specifically talking about requiring semi-modern instruction sets

0
0
1
@chjara
@wamwoowam their official requirements are some date cutoff in 2017, not any architectural or generational cutoffs
0
0
1