Conversation

if “-LD” is a suffix we can add to any data interchange format to make it worse, how’s about we do YAML-LD-LD

9
3
1

@sodiboo go ahead, I don't think you can't make YAML any worse

1
1
1

@sodiboo

activitystreams 2-ld

0
1
0

@sodiboo mfw I was originally confused when I looked up JSON-LD expecting line-delimited JSON but I got something completely different. turns out what I was thinking of was actually called LDJSON, and it hasn't even been called that for over a decade! (it's called NDJSON now)

now, what about LDJSON-LD?

1
1
1

@sodiboo “@context@context” is used to describe which <plain>@context</plain> of current <plain>@context</plain> is the <plain>@context</plain> used in YAML-LD’ <plain>@context</plain>

0
1
1

@sodiboo @arichtman no you see sodi, it's a joke with many layers, just like a dia-an onion neofox_angel

0
0
1

@sodiboo that sounds like something that should be already forbidden by geneva conventions

0
1
0